Sunday, September 12, 2010
One of the comments made on another blog during the recent discussions about a woman leading the Kabbbalat Shabbat (Welcoming the Sabbath) service in an Orthodox synagogue was that no one seems to be concerned that women leading English prayers on Shabbat morning might slip and accidentally lead Ashrei. I don't get it. What would be the big deal if a woman led Ashrei? It's just a psalm, like the ones in Kabbalat Shabbat. Does Ashrei have some special status? Kindly enlighten me.
About Me
- Name: Shira Salamone
Once upon a time, I belonged to a left-wing egalitarian Conservative synagogue, where I was one of a number of women who wore a tallit—and one of the few members who used an Orthodox prayer book (adding the Mothers, of course). Having moved since then, I now belong to a right-wing traditional Conservative synagogue, where I’m almost always the only woman wearing a tallit—and one of the few members who adds the Mothers. I seem destined to be forever . . . on the fringe.
PUBLIC SERVICE POSTS
- Park your ego at the door: Links to my series "On raising a child with disabilities"
- Parenting 101
- Febrile seizures: Life-saving information
Previous Posts
- Our neighborhood's newest church: Our shul :(
- Rosh HaShanah report
- Wrist action: I'm back to making my own tzimmes!
- Shanah Tovah u-M'tukah!
- Saved by the, er, Post Office
- You can't keep a dancer down
- Fashion: Bah, humbug! :(
- Taking it for a spin
- All or nothing :(
- This so-called diet is actually working?!
MY BLOGROLL
Archives
- August 2004
- September 2004
- October 2004
- November 2004
- December 2004
- January 2005
- February 2005
- March 2005
- April 2005
- May 2005
- June 2005
- July 2005
- August 2005
- September 2005
- October 2005
- November 2005
- December 2005
- January 2006
- February 2006
- March 2006
- April 2006
- May 2006
- June 2006
- July 2006
- August 2006
- September 2006
- October 2006
- November 2006
- December 2006
- January 2007
- February 2007
- March 2007
- April 2007
- May 2007
- June 2007
- July 2007
- August 2007
- September 2007
- October 2007
- November 2007
- December 2007
- January 2008
- February 2008
- March 2008
- April 2008
- May 2008
- June 2008
- July 2008
- August 2008
- September 2008
- October 2008
- November 2008
- December 2008
- January 2009
- February 2009
- March 2009
- April 2009
- May 2009
- June 2009
- July 2009
- August 2009
- September 2009
- October 2009
- November 2009
- December 2009
- January 2010
- February 2010
- March 2010
- April 2010
- May 2010
- June 2010
- July 2010
- August 2010
- September 2010
- October 2010
- November 2010
- December 2010
- January 2011
- February 2011
- March 2011
- April 2011
- May 2011
- June 2011
- July 2011
- August 2011
- September 2011
- October 2011
- November 2011
- December 2011
- January 2012
- February 2012
- March 2012
- April 2012
- May 2012
- June 2012
- July 2012
- August 2012
- September 2012
- October 2012
- November 2012
- December 2012
- January 2013
- February 2013
- March 2013
- April 2013
- May 2013
- June 2013
- July 2013
- August 2013
- September 2013
- October 2013
- November 2013
- December 2013
- January 2014
- February 2014
- March 2014
- April 2014
- May 2014
- June 2014
- July 2014
- August 2014
- September 2014
- October 2014
- November 2014
- December 2014
- January 2015
- February 2015
- March 2015
- April 2015
- May 2015
- June 2015
- July 2015
- August 2015
- September 2015
- October 2015
- November 2015
- December 2015
- January 2016
- February 2016
- March 2016
- April 2016
- May 2016
- June 2016
- July 2016
- August 2016
- September 2016
- October 2016
- November 2016
- December 2016
- January 2017
- February 2017
- March 2017
- April 2017
- May 2017
- June 2017
- July 2017
- August 2017
- September 2017
- October 2017
- November 2017
- December 2017
- January 2018
- February 2018
- March 2018
- April 2018
- May 2018
- July 2018
- August 2018
- September 2018
- October 2018
- November 2018
- December 2018
- January 2019
- February 2019
- March 2019
- April 2019
- May 2019
- June 2019
- July 2019
- August 2019
- September 2019
- October 2019
- November 2019
- December 2019
- January 2020
- February 2020
- March 2020
- April 2020
- May 2020
- June 2020
- July 2020
- August 2020
- September 2020
- October 2020
- November 2020
- December 2020
- January 2021
- February 2021
- March 2021
- April 2021
- May 2021
- June 2021
- July 2021
- August 2021
- September 2021
- October 2021
- November 2021
- December 2021
- January 2022
- February 2022
- March 2022
- April 2022
- May 2022
- June 2022
- July 2022
- August 2022
- September 2022
- October 2022
- November 2022
- December 2022
- January 2023
- February 2023
- March 2023
- April 2023
- May 2023
- June 2023
- July 2023
- August 2023
- September 2023
- October 2023
- November 2023
- December 2023
- January 2024
- February 2024
- March 2024
- April 2024
- May 2024
- June 2024
- July 2024
- August 2024
- September 2024
- October 2024
- November 2024
- December 2024
- January 2025
- February 2025
- March 2025
9 Comments:
I have no idea what the problem might be, maybe because Ashrei is responsive?
I think it's kind of funny, because we almost always let kids who are just under b'nai mitzvah age lead the Ashrei during the Torah service. I would be surprised if that's a problem.
Just because someone wrote something on a blog, doesn't mean it's real.
Just because someone writes something filled with Yiddish expressions, doesn't make them right.
So I'm right that there's no good reason why a woman couldn't lead Ashrei? Thanks for the information.
I have no clue, pretty sure Ashrei isn't that significant either way.
Ask a knowledgable Rabbi, that's pretty esoteric an issue.
Considering the fact that our congregation can no longer afford even a part-time rabbi, that may be easier said than done. :(
Chava, sorry I missed your comment. I think it depends on whether you mean "kids" or "boys." Some of my recent reading seems to indicate that, in halachah/Jewish religious law, boys may have a higher status than adult women because they'll grow up to be "obligated," which is considered a privilege, whereas we females are, fundamentally, assigned the status of perpetual children. So letting boys lead certain prayers is a form of on-the-job training, preparing them for their future role as service-leaders.
Shira,
That's irrelevant to your question, and your statement is obviously factually incorrect. Women are not perpetually children, as male children grow up to become men and female children grow up to be women.
Two issues. Is the prayer an obligation of men in the minyan, if so, it needs to be led by someone obligated, a man having obtained his majority.
If the prayer is not obligated, there is flexibility in the issue.
To suggest that boys have "higher status" than women is just a meaningless statement, there isn't a status involved. Boys will grow up to be men, and therefore have the obligations. So certain parts of the service get used as an opportunity to teach the boys to be used to communal prayer.
Nothing magically happens on one's 13th birthday. Using the time before that to train is not treating women as children, it's accepting that we as a community have an obligation to teach the next generation.
While Partnership Minyanim can do all the adult self indulgence they want within the bounds of Halacha, there is a reason that they appeal to the single and DINK families in NYC only, they simply aren't of practical interest to families with children.
Or, bluntly, for completely practical reasons, it is more important for the Jewish world to cultivate an interest in a 10 year old boy wanting to be an active involved Jewish adult than there is in appeasing your interest in filling your empty nestor days with an interest in learning this stuff.
Impractical Halachot have a short lifespan, practical ones last a long time. Practical/Impractical in this case is based on it's ability to transmit itself, so people have to get enough out of it to maintain it AND it can't interfere in retention rates or birth rates.
Miami Al, when I said that "we females are, fundamentally, assigned the status of perpetual children," I meant from a *halachic* perspective, in that boys will grow up to be obligated to observe time-bound mitzvot, whereas women will not. You may disagree with that statement, as well.
"To suggest that boys have "higher status" than women is just a meaningless statement, there isn't a status involved." For the record, I didn't "invent" this idea, I read it elsewhere. Whoever said may have been mistaken.
My clarification of your statement:
"Nothing magically happens on one's 13th birthday. Using the time before that to train is not treating women as children, it's accepting that we as a community have an obligation to teach the next generation" *of prayer-leaders.*
"While Partnership Minyanim can do all the adult self indulgence they want within the bounds of Halacha, there is a reason that they appeal to the single and DINK [dual-income, no-kids] families in NYC only, they simply aren't of practical interest to families with children."
That's a lot more diplomatic than your next paragraph. :(
"Impractical Halachot have a short lifespan, practical ones last a long time. Practical/Impractical in this case is based on it's ability to transmit itself, so people have to get enough out of it to maintain it AND it can't interfere in retention rates or birth rates."
Okay, I get it. You can put down the sledgehammer now. :)
Shira,
Stop rewriting my statements into what you want them to be.
It's not about cultivating boys as prayer leaders, it's about getting them to become part of the communal prayer service.
When a boy is brought up to lead a prayer, it's 1-2 boys out of dozens in that age range. However, by seeing their peer up their, they are integrated in the process. Large Ashkenazi congregations have multiple minyanim, including young/teen/older teen/young guys minyanim. So this involvement is used to get the attention of the guys wandering around the social hall since the youth minyan ended, pull people from the teen minyan in to see their younger sibling/friend's younger sibling, etc.
Again, the service uses its opportunities to get boys ready to leave the confines of their segregated service and into the main one.
Letting a 10-12 year old boy lead the prayer serves a purpose for the community.
Letting a woman do so simply draws attention to the gender separation and de facto challenges it.
The former helps the community, the latter does not.
Most of Orthodox Jewish life does NOT take place in the Synagogue. Your obsession with the behavior of people in synagogues you don't attend is really really strange.
Post a Comment
<< Home